Honestly, not much has changed for the Warlock when going from 1 to 2. Well, the army images have changed, but they changed for all armies. There are now 3 dragons instead of 1, and Minotaurs can now be upgraded. The army images in the first game (especially considering it was released more than 10 years before the 5th game) are the best in the entire series. And the heroes there were magnificent, not the dead portraits from the 5th game.
By the way, upgrades were also added in the 2nd game, which is also a significant change.
The army images in the first game are terrible, that's just my opinion. :)
The heroes? They really have no differences and seem very alive! Almost like dolls with different portraits.
But in the 5th game, each hero has their own play style, their own characteristics, and so on.
Everything else also fits in great. It's just that not everyone thinks ice cream is delicious. :smile24:
and there's no need to say that Sandro and Crag Hack were mentioned in the 5th game.
Sandro's cloak also doesn't exist. :cool:
There are mentions.
and it's strange that you consider changing the unit images to be so significant... I was only talking about replacing units.
For you, is Might and Magic the same as Heroes? The game is called "Heroes," that's the main word in the title. It's even written in capital letters, and originally, Might and Magic was probably taken "more or less, why not."
But in Might and Magic, moving away from the old world is definitely a thing.
We're not in your neighborhood, buddy.
Godric, Vittorio, Giovanni, Lucretia, etc., I'm sorry, but what is this? So "pop," I'm sorry, no other word came to mind.
in comparison to the 3rd game, does the game have such ugly hero portraits?
Meet Vlad

Cute, I think.
Will you also admire a piece of crap with the inscription "Heroes V"?
Except the ones we've made