Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
And Will and Reason, isn't that new? A tournament was held, and the French are playing. So, it's quite possible. I'm against maps that haven't been tested enough in online play.
Let's make it simpler: we'll create a commission of experienced players. They will ensure that unbalanced or rush-oriented maps don't make it to the tournament. Then, from the list that passes the selection, we'll choose through voting or an automatic draw. I prefer the draw because it doesn't require waiting.
Wanderer, of course, there's time for testing. But we've already seen it. There was already a championship. How many people tested the maps? About 10% of the players.
Understand, I'm trying to prevent trash like Lion's Muzzle or Battle of Underground from making it to the tournament (although, to be honest, I would also send straightforward Iron home :).