Heroes 6 - Discussion

In what way is the 5th installment "simplified"?

At least in terms of movement on the map.
I also don't like the initial setup before the battle. In the 3rd game, you had to be lucky to get such an advantage, and in the 4th game, there's no such easy setup at all. Either you build various barricades during the battle or play without them.

Grammar Nazis, get in the car!!!!11

Writing "korovany" is already too much :) Is the test word "korova"? (which, by the way, cannot be checked itself;))

If we don't take into account those "fans" who play the game for a month and then forget about it, then there are more people who prefer the 3rd game. The fact is that, even judging by the posts on the forum, many people learned about Heroes with the release of the 5th game. But they learned about it and then forgot. Of course, there are many veterans for whom the 5th game is their favorite in the series, but there are definitely not more of them than those who prefer the 3rd game.

What difference does it make how long they play?) Let them play for even just one day; the main thing for the developers is that their product is bought.

Also, there should be an option to send resources from mines/sawmills/quarries via caravans, so that they are not transferred by telepathy.

They are transferred through the air :) There is a special type of dragon - messenger dragons.

I often hear this phrase, but what does it mean? What changes can "kill the spirit" of Heroes? In other words, after what changes does Heroes cease to be Heroes?

Stuffing it with all sorts of nonsense to please the masses.

This reminds me of the complaints of old people - they say that in their time, the grass was greener, the sky was bluer, and Heroes was much better than it is now. For those who started playing with the 5th game, it is the real Heroes. And I, for example, started with the 4th game, so should I just throw the 5th game away? I think we need to move forward, not stand still. IMHO.
Heroes should remain a turn-based strategy in the fantasy style. All other changes can be considered.

We need to move forward, no one argues with that, but firstly, the best is the enemy of the good, and secondly, it is unlikely that we will be able to make real progress.
Do you really think that the 5th game is a big step forward?:eek:
Well, it's a decent game, but it didn't provide any significant leap in development. If the same number of patches could have been released for the 3rd and 4th games, then the 5th game would be a pale shadow compared to them.
So, its only advancement is a good balance of factions, a magic system, and skills (just as the 3rd game was an improvement over the 2nd, the 5th game is an improvement over the 4th).

So don't expect the 6th game :) If it turns out to be unsuccessful, there will be less disappointment, and if it's good, then the delight will be even greater :) Well, the particularly self-critical ones can kick themselves - they'll say, "I didn't believe in it."