Questions, answers, and resolution of disputes regarding the online rating in HoMM5.

Auto-translated

1. Tournament standings.
Okay, there won't be any tournament standings. To be honest, I don't really see the need for them either (WisTrit, in post #44, you expressed support for such a table; maybe there was a misunderstanding?).

I meant to keep the tournament rating and the regular rating separate, as the tournament rating is calculated differently. :smile02:

I think once a week is not too often. It's also more convenient to keep track of the scores this way than to deal with a bunch of reports later (and you might make a mistake).

Do you mean updating the scores by processing the reports? Then, of course, once a week is fine. :smile14:

Cherk gets 10 (according to the rules). You can agree on 8-12. Each player can use only ONE hero allowed by the other side during one game (several duels). This is the rule. All duels are played this way and only this way. Period.

So, how many duels will there be in one Cherk game then? 5 would be just right. :smile24:
This is just my opinion.

I disagree with the 10 banned heroes, as Lord Vampire probably came up with this to suit himself and mainly practiced with this setup. IMO, this reduces the variety of matchups.

How is that "to suit himself"? Does that mean the others can only ban heroes in a way that's clearly worse?
In my opinion, 8-10-12 is the most convenient and best option.

I didn't develop the rules. I just calculated the rating. Apparently, that was unnecessary, and I should have waited for Starkhan.

Stop being angry with everyone; it's just a mistake. :)

Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made

Reading content in

Interface language

Questions, answers, and resolution of disputes regarding the online rating in HoMM5.