Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Should we ban the Griffin Conservatory and the Hive of Serpents?
Dear players, I would like to propose a controversial idea for discussion: completely banning the use of provisions and clues in the rules (please don't throw virtual rotten tomatoes and eggs at me :)). This idea is not accidental or spontaneous; I have been thinking about it for a long time and carefully, and I am increasingly convinced that if it is not necessary, it will definitely make online battles much more interesting. Arguments in favor: the placement of clues and provisions is absolutely chaotic; the problem is not how often they are taken, but whether they are given out or not. People have repeatedly expressed their opposition to the "monster week," but the "monster week" is nothing compared to a couple of maximum clues or well-distributed provisions, because you still need to build and buy +5 monsters, but here it's a complete freebie. A possible ban on clues and provisions could increase the role of native troops in castles and bring a fresh perspective and new interest to online battles.
P.S.
1. This is just my personal opinion, although I am confident in it.
2. Moderators, please attach a poll.