Dirty_Player
Auto-translated
My IMHO:
1. The names are excellent! No "Partal" masters or overpowered "Jedi" :D
2. Regarding newcomers. I suggest using the number of seasonal games as a criterion. 5 games - can be included in the tournament. 20 games - can no longer be considered a newcomer (the numbers are approximate). A newcomer tournament is a great idea! Again, the participation conditions need to be worked out. And the idea of a prize in the form of a game with a top player is a mega-great idea!! (You could even give the winner the right to choose the player they would like to play against).
3. Regarding tournaments. Tournaments need to be very strictly systematized. Otherwise, it will turn out that there are 10 tournaments running in parallel, or even 0. Any organizer must notify the administration of their desire to organize a tournament and take a place in the tournament calendar, where other participants can choose the most convenient tournament for themselves.
4. Training. Indeed, it would be good to do something like what Nagan-4 suggests. But who would do it, and who would read it? I agree with Vick that only a few people read it, which is a pity :( We need something more interesting and visual, for example, a training video (like in poker).
5. Arbitration Committee (AC). The AC is needed to determine and resolve controversial issues, such as with Djedi or in the Pit for LM vs Forrest game. The number of AC members does not matter. You can make it 5 or 8 people.
1. The names are excellent! No "Partal" masters or overpowered "Jedi" :D
2. Regarding newcomers. I suggest using the number of seasonal games as a criterion. 5 games - can be included in the tournament. 20 games - can no longer be considered a newcomer (the numbers are approximate). A newcomer tournament is a great idea! Again, the participation conditions need to be worked out. And the idea of a prize in the form of a game with a top player is a mega-great idea!! (You could even give the winner the right to choose the player they would like to play against).
3. Regarding tournaments. Tournaments need to be very strictly systematized. Otherwise, it will turn out that there are 10 tournaments running in parallel, or even 0. Any organizer must notify the administration of their desire to organize a tournament and take a place in the tournament calendar, where other participants can choose the most convenient tournament for themselves.
4. Training. Indeed, it would be good to do something like what Nagan-4 suggests. But who would do it, and who would read it? I agree with Vick that only a few people read it, which is a pity :( We need something more interesting and visual, for example, a training video (like in poker).
5. Arbitration Committee (AC). The AC is needed to determine and resolve controversial issues, such as with Djedi or in the Pit for LM vs Forrest game. The number of AC members does not matter. You can make it 5 or 8 people.
