Hello everyone.

Why is it so difficult to decide on the coefficient to award for tournament wins? Once you decide (if you decide), and the points are added for past tournaments, the ranking will be more objective, and the names of strong tournament players will appear at the top of the list. Also, you need to decide how many points to award for the places taken in tournaments. And whether to award them at all? After all, the winner will already receive a good number of points due to the coefficients. In any case, in my opinion, the winner of a tournament should not be awarded more than 100 points, which is about 7 wins in regular games. If you give more, it will be unbalanced.