Rules for Heroes of Might and Magic III online tournaments on HeroesWorld.

That's He3Hauka. I'll answer questions related to the matter, based on my understanding of the situation.

1. If Dirty had been included in the initial list, in my opinion, he wouldn't have been last in terms of votes. The initial list was simply created based on the first people who responded, which meant that other respected individuals were essentially left out and had to settle for the "additional list." Because of this, many people are now voting, choosing from the 7 initial candidates, and rarely paying attention to the "additional" ones. It's a bit wrong like this. :(

Yes, the fact that Dirty_Player wasn't included in the list was a mistake, as evidenced by the voting results. Moreover, he has the skills, desire, and ability to work. At the time the list was compiled, about 20 people participated in the discussion. Unfortunately, no one suggested his candidacy. And I also thought that he would be more suitable for working in the Organizing Committee...
The other candidates from the "additional list" are just a formality. Nagan-4, invisible, Javdet, and ewgeniy have withdrawn their candidacies.

2. How many people should be in the AC? For example, I want there to be 5, many want there to be 7. Will the number of people in the AC be determined purely by majority? Like, if 20 people vote for a composition of the AC with 7 members, and 10 people vote for 5 members, then there will be 7. Am I understanding correctly?

Initially, 5 people were planned. During the discussion, a good option of 7 was formed. This number may be more convenient, considering what is written in my 93rd post above.

3. How will "against" votes be taken into account? Let's say one candidate has 7 votes against him and 18 votes for him out of 25 votes. The second candidate has 12 votes "for" and no votes against. Who is more preferable? In my opinion, 12-0 is more preferable than 18-7, because the one with many "against" votes is, let's say, not respected by a sufficient number of people. I repeat, IMO.

My opinion regarding 12-0 and 18-7 is the same as yours. Let's discuss this issue. Please share your opinions. But people don't just vote "against" because of disrespect. I voted "against" TaKo's candidacy, on the contrary, out of respect for the girl and to protect her from not entirely correct questions that the AC will have to deal with. And many people share this opinion.

4. I initially thought I should vote for someone from the 7 initial candidates, can I change my decision now?

I don't mind. We're not electing the President of the country. I didn't expect that voting for additional candidates would start spontaneously. And I considered it possible for myself to "re-vote"...

My suggestion: organize a real vote, automatic, with buttons for "for" and "against," a large list of ALL the people suggested here, the ability to choose 5 or 7 members of the AC, and the final decision-making principle should be announced in advance, with specific voting deadlines.

I'm not sure if this is necessary. Judging by what we already have, a larger list is unlikely. There is only one more real candidate. The specific deadlines are in my post 65 in this thread. And I don't cheat or manipulate the results; I write down what there is. Buttons would certainly inspire more confidence... How would you vote using buttons? And there are several other people with the same problems as you.

The main thing: ALL the powers of the AC are fully defined, its structure of work and actions regarding which cases and at what specific time the AC's decision should be made + complex situations within the AC itself (let's say, out of 7 members, 3 are unavailable, 1 is for, 1 is against, and 2 abstain. How to make a decision in such cases?

The tasks that will face the AC are outlined quite clearly. All these questions will find their solution in the near future. I am working on this and hope for the help of the future AC. I have a session in progress, so I can't do everything at once. In general, this is a matter of trust in the AC. Naturally, all this will be discussed openly and with the opinions of all players taken into account. Give me some time...

I would be interested in seeing a list of the people who voted against me...

I'm sorry, I can't do that (my post 65 in this thread):

* The secrecy of the vote will be observed to the following extent: I will finalize the results in the form of an EXCEL table and pass it on to the moderators ewgeniy, vbn, Ta Kotoraya... and to Nagan-4.