Discussions on various topics. Lots of off-topic content.

Most players (whose opinion you seem to rely on so much) consider it to be bad. I am one of them.

O_O, that's quite a strange conclusion about my preferences. Oh well, never mind. Let's go through this step by step.
My thesis: in RPGs, the character progression system is important.

Your response: no, that's not true. In The Witcher, it's terrible, and you yourself said so.

My response: I was only talking about the combat system that I didn't like, but the character progression system was fine with me.

Your response: most people consider it to be bad...

What's the point of that argument? Why did you refer to my words if you're now switching to the opinion of the majority? O_o

Millions of flies are attracted to sweets, and millions of flies are attracted to garbage. Personally, I don't understand anything. Does this mean that sweets = garbage? Or what?

Let's break it down step by step.
Your thesis: all flies are attracted to garbage because that's their nature. Flies are also attracted to sweets, but not all of them (if we assume, correct me if I'm wrong, but flies definitely don't lay eggs in sugar).

My response (now in more detail): all people (or flies, whichever is more convenient) test a game before talking about it (this is like laying eggs).
If the game is good or excellent, it will be recognized by the majority (flies are attracted to sweets).
Note.
Yes, there are many exceptions. But according to this "fly system," I think that's how it would be interpreted.