Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Yesterday, I decided to read the HW forum and was surprised to see that the topic about the autosave feature received so many responses. There are some good ideas from both WIC and ASM. The big problem is that there are still fundamental disagreements – for example, I don't see a way to convince WIC to give up on the idea of re-orderable units, and ASM – to abandon the idea of completely removing classes and experience. Considering that there are already more than 50 ideas for the next version of TE, many of which are quite controversial, and given the stubbornness of all parties, I think that another split among players is inevitable. ASM has a powerful advantage (simultaneous turn), but if they attach controversial gameplay changes to it, then even with simultaneous turns, they can forget about the "sodovites" (presumably a reference to a specific player group), and TE players (as progressive and risk-taking) will partially play the familiar TE, and partially – ASM's version.