Rules for Heroes of Might and Magic III online tournaments on HeroesWorld.

I agree. Those who were actively involved in forum discussions will continue to do so. Therefore, what I referred to as the "executive body" can remain an unofficial entity.

Yes. I don't see a range of responsibilities that would require any kind of committee.

1. Someone organizes a tournament, but the organizer loses interest, players become less active, real life takes over, and the tournament stalls.

Self-organization or attracting another host from outside. If the players want to finish the tournament, they will definitely do so.

2. Cheaters.

Resolve the issue based on a voting principle. The organizers of the tournaments should have the priority in making decisions, because accepting or rejecting players for the tournament is within their competence.

Who should we choose? It's best not to choose me. But many people would be suitable; "power" won't corrupt them.

Even if it doesn't corrupt them, there will be a number of difficulties. For example, there will be times when a task falls on someone, and the solution is difficult for them, but something needs to be done.

Ideally, a judge should be smarter, more authoritative, and psychologically stronger than the people about whom he is making a decision. But this is not always the case; people are different. I have repeatedly observed strong people putting pressure on a weaker official (for example). It's a pathetic sight.