Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
HIT, UNDERSTAND, LESS BULLSHIT
MEET, INVISIBLE AT THE MICROPHONE
Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message
2 Oelm, okay, everything will be fine now, sorry, but I can't call you "you". No offense.
Just, you, Sergey, specify what army, parameters, etc. I'll take it with 6 demons if the magic is good. Or did you forget that 60 demons is the whole army? Or does the fact that there are 14 level 6 creatures and 1 level 7 in your save not bother you? And the fact that there are cool skills and mass shield, does that not count either?
First, I wrote:
invisible (01:10:53 1/05/2009) 60 demons and fodder can easily take even a max utopia on week 2 invisible (01:11:03 1/05/2009) with normal parameters
In my example, only demons are involved in the main attack (almost). Did I post something different in my save? Or are 8 vipers the main attack force here? Or maybe 6 efreets are so strong that they can take max utopia on their own? In my example, the main attack force is 60 demons, and all other troops are fodder
Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message
, or are you going to deny this again? Maybe, because you like to show off, but I don't care, because I know how to answer for my words, but can you do it, we'll see now... Will you deny that mass earth on the second week is a rarity, and that mass shield or mass stone skin is also a big deal?!
Going to utopia on the second week without expert armor is suicide.
Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message
If you have never taken utopia on the second week, then that's your problem (as well as failing to take GO on the second week).
I don't play Inferno very well, and I don't like the castle itself, because I'm not very good at demonology (unlike Dirty))). I remember the game I gave as an example for a long time, because on the second week, I didn't take any other castle on SM except Shakti and Gosha. And I gave this example precisely because it fits the topic being discussed: taking a max utopia for Inferno, with demons as the main attack force and all other troops as fodder!!! In this case, the main goal is to save as many demons as possible, because 1 angel and 8 vipers are not a main attack force, and I didn't want to take efreets at first, but when I found out that it was a max utopia, I took everyone I could. The utopia was a bit on the side, so there was no point in going back to it later, because the momentum would be lost. Moreover, there were hives, cons and another utopia visible on the neighboring resource. It would have been possible to wait a couple of days and take the utopia with a bonus, BUT: the momentum would be lost, and on day 131, all the bonus from three castles can be used to replenish the demons, thereby compensating for the losses suffered in this utopia (to be honest, I didn't expect a max, although I was ready for it). And 6 efreets, 2 angels (which were in the real game) and 8 vipers can be exchanged for 50k gold (money is very important for demonology!) and a lot of artifacts, among which there is a high probability of getting control and parameters. Regarding the skills, Marius has innate armor, and offensive skills are acquired. In my save, Marius is level 1, so his bonus to demons doesn't matter, right?)))
Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message
Or did I not write about the game, etc. right away? Is that a sin? As soon as I saw the report, I wrote!
This is not a sin, it's feigned vanity and ambition. When (I've written this for the tenth time already) I told you that I would write a report about the game that ended late at night, you didn't say anything. What other report could I have written if we had just finished playing?! You didn't write right away when you saw my report, but a few days later, and only when I myself reminded you and asked, like, why aren't you confirming it, to which you replied:
invisible (23:19:53 17/02/2009) hello, will you write a report?=0 invisible (23:19:55 17/02/2009)
Oelm (23:20:01 17/02/2009) Hello! Oelm (23:20:08 17/02/2009) I will, but Oelm (23:20:24 17/02/2009) it would be better to warn in advance that we are playing for rating invisible (23:20:41 17/02/2009) I understood, I'll delete it now Oelm (23:20:51 17/02/2009) no, don't delete it Oelm (23:20:57 17/02/2009) just we can agree invisible (23:21:04 17/02/2009) I usually play for rating, and I write reports that are worth attention Oelm (23:21:06 17/02/2009) what if I lose to you again Oelm (23:21:13 17/02/2009) will you forgive me Oelm (23:21:22 17/02/2009) I wouldn't play on a random map for rating invisible (23:21:31 17/02/2009) I don't like that, to be honest Oelm (23:21:34 17/02/2009) on an unfamiliar map invisible (23:21:35 17/02/2009) I'll delete it now Oelm (23:21:47 17/02/2009) I thought you just wanted to practice invisible (23:22:06 17/02/2009) rating is a general level of play. And those who write such things don't evoke positive emotions in me Oelm (23:22:07 17/02/2009) and I already have too many losses lately invisible (23:22:09 17/02/2009) I'll delete it now and forget about it invisible (23:22:43 17/02/2009) deleted
After that, I deleted the report (which, by the way, was very good), and I put you on ignore, but that's not the point))).
In general, don't embarrass yourself if it's already clear what I meant in my post.
I don't know who you were talking about, but I think the meaning of what was written above is clear))).
Let's see where I complained about the layout. I'll take a look!!!
Damn, I don't want to dig through the history, especially since no one is paying me for it. I thought there was little, but there are so many pages, it's a disaster)). If it's a matter of principle for you, maybe you should post it?)) I accused you of asking for auto in almost every game (sometimes several times per game), prove the opposite, because I don't want to. But if you really ask, and you also buy me a beer, then maybe I'll agree to do this job))). Or maybe your conscience will remember a couple of moments, and you'll ignore it)))?
Without exp. earth, without marik, without exp. offense, without all that crap that you brought.
I think I already answered half of your smart words above. I just didn't understand about offense and "crap" Do you want me to go to utopia with the parameters you want? Do you want me to take a max utopia on week 2 only with native troops? Excuse me, but where did I say that it is possible? You quoted from my personal correspondence with Cash. Where does it say something like that?! It seems to say something about taking a max utopia on the second week with 50-60 demons + fodder + normal parameters. Right? I proved that this is possible, and I proved it with an example from a real online game. What else should I do, give you some tea or lull you to sleep so that you calm down and calm your exaggerated ambition!?
PS Honestly, I said bad things about Wlk777 in our conversation, about how ambitious he is. I'm ready to take back all those words now, even though we had some disagreements, because he seems like a decent guy now (maybe he was a little hot-tempered like me, maybe he likes beer, like me))). But you, Oelm, remind me of a market woman (and the comparison is almost spot on)))
PSS And I sometimes read the forum, and I'm not going to report to you about it!
BESHA
