Alternative rating.

I hope they’ll delete everything anyway.

There is a completely unique atmosphere here. It cannot be destroyed. Some kind of wild and absurd coincidence of circumstances… And a deplorable result. WE ALL must come together and restore what was.

09.03.2009
Here I found something that caught my attention not so long ago, something that is truly the truth and what we need to strive for.
But somehow there wasn't much reaction to it, although I am sure that most people read it, saw it, and participated in it.
Everything has been said, discussed, and debated in the topic about this rating, but now, when the number of games starts to work against those who used to play them – dissatisfaction arises, and even with such, let's say, "not mature," funny, in my opinion, ultimatums.
No, this is nonsense! It was clearly stated that the rating would become more or less optimal only after six months, or even a year. And now, too much depends on the number of games.
This rating, as far as I understand, takes this into account:
/topic/5631/
hence the zeros in the table.
Wlk, you were higher than many of those whom you subsequently lost to in this table, and according to these formulas (which, by the way, are recognized worldwide), losing to an opponent who is lower than you in the table subtracts quite a lot of points compared to what is added when winning against such a player.
If I’m wrong, criticize me. I’m just tired of pointless arguments.
P.S. seems like they moved it to a normal thread...