Alternative rating.

Shouting and threats won't help, that's for sure ;)

Seriously though, provide the facts, and measures will be taken:smile33:
The rating is quite normal; it's just updated approximately once a month, and due to the transition from the regular system (SS-D) to an "alternative" one, there are some minor discrepancies.
For example, you have a negative win/loss ratio, which means you have fewer than 1500 points, and the fact that many people are ranked higher than you is because most of them are inactive players, and I think they will be removed with the transition to the summer season.

The rating is stupid; it doesn't take into account the strength of the opponents you win or lose against. I'm in 100th place, but in reality, there are probably only about 30 people in the ranking who could beat, for example, Dubrovin or Britva even once, as I did. I've had many games against beginner opponents, and the victories were too easy, so I didn't think it was necessary to record them. Also, I try to play against not the weakest opponents, which is why I have a negative balance. However, with a reasonable scoring system, my rating should be positive; I'm sure of it. Regarding Vigo, I have already provided evidence of his cheating; they were deleted, but he is allowed to accuse others of cheating without any attempt to justify it. I state responsibly and am always ready to prove that Vigo is a CHEATER. Let him refute this, but I think he will remain silent again.