Round table

I suggest that we still discuss all the bugs that have been noticed, perhaps without revealing their essence, and agree on whether to allow them or ban them.

+1

There is an opinion to publicly announce the names of such comrades.

This is a very controversial issue, because first you need to determine the true reasons for the player's unwillingness (or inability?) to finish the game. This is almost impossible to do. I see a way out either in discussing the game time limits together with the completion time in the season rules, so that, for example, when the game (or completion) is delayed beyond the specified time (for example, a month), a previously agreed "judge" is called in to either determine the guilt in the unfinished game and impose a technical defeat, or if the guilt of both players is equal, make a decision. But this path seems tedious and unpromising to me. The option of simply not playing with such a player in "friendly games" (unless the tournament bracket brings them together) is much simpler and does not bother anyone.