Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
What is written in the wiki is nonsense because it is written by a certain group of people who cannot objectively explain what post-punk is. Many, including those who were present at its inception, cannot accurately define the line between post-punk and something else.
This is all taken from the literature of that time, "punk philosophies," and other sources, including biographies. So, who knows what post-punk really is.
You can be a virtuoso playing progressive music, but that doesn't mean others can't. Just as you shouldn't use a grinder to play black metal, you shouldn't use whipped cream to fill in the gaps for progressive musicians.
Punk may be simpler in terms of playing the instrument (like a guitar), but not in terms of the music itself. Billions of small details make even the most mediocre compositions in terms of instrumentation excellent. And punk is primarily music of words.
Regarding not knowing post-black metal, I didn't try to specifically identify and listen to post-black metal. But I have a musician friend who listens to and plays black metal. Although he plays virtuously, he only accepts pure black metal. However, he listens to tons of music and knows everything about this style and all its branches.
But nevertheless, he doesn't consider "post" to be more virtuoso.
Tomorrow holds no promises Except the ones we've made