Medium_HP
Auto-translated
The situation would have been much more difficult to assess if it weren't for the proximity of the metro entrance to the passage from grass to snow.
When approaching the shifted guard, the player often cannot determine whether there was a double guard here before, which the opponent might have broken through, and therefore the shifted guard can be bypassed, or the opponent didn't break through anything, and the player needs to attack the shifted guard himself (in this case, the Griffons). Only the opponent can tell whether the shifted guard needs to be attacked. The problem arises when there is no certainty that the opponent saw this part of the map, as it is undesirable to discuss the situation with him, giving information about the map and his own actions.
In this case, the presence of a broken-through entrance to the metro nearby gave Blue confidence that Red had seen this passage and these Griffons. Therefore, Blue should have asked the opponent if it was possible to pass by them. Blue's mistake is obvious; the punishment is up to the opponent.
When approaching the shifted guard, the player often cannot determine whether there was a double guard here before, which the opponent might have broken through, and therefore the shifted guard can be bypassed, or the opponent didn't break through anything, and the player needs to attack the shifted guard himself (in this case, the Griffons). Only the opponent can tell whether the shifted guard needs to be attacked. The problem arises when there is no certainty that the opponent saw this part of the map, as it is undesirable to discuss the situation with him, giving information about the map and his own actions.
In this case, the presence of a broken-through entrance to the metro nearby gave Blue confidence that Red had seen this passage and these Griffons. Therefore, Blue should have asked the opponent if it was possible to pass by them. Blue's mistake is obvious; the punishment is up to the opponent.