Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
SEM_56 is ready to play, but I'm betting on the opponent, not on you:D.
He's currently playing at 200% without any diplomacy, focusing only on Rampart (he mentioned controlling it for 4-6 minutes), but according to him, he enjoys overcoming challenges. When I suggested playing against an opponent from our sites at 160%, he didn't respond. In short, if SEM_56 actually plays against him, I'll give Roman my thanks.
DENCHELSEA also said he would play at 200%. I argued that the game would be long and that 160% difficulty with standard conditions would be better. That's when he started ignoring me on ICQ, and now we'll figure out the game...:smile08:
It turned out to be a rather unpleasant conversation. It felt like I was trying to convince a child to eat porridge, and he refused...
He insisted on playing only at 200% and claimed he doesn't know how to play at 160%.
In short, it was like dealing with a child.