Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Honestly, Wlk777 is acting like a child! First, he was shouting at the top of his lungs that vampires are easy to kill, but he couldn't do it himself even once. Then, when both of us chose castles, it turned out that the necromancer was stronger than the rampart. What's there to say? I think it's just complete noobishness. However, I respect Wlk777 for taking the risk and defending his point of view in the battle. It's a pity he didn't succeed, but still, respect to him as a fighter!
To be honest, I relaxed after the previous easily won battles and made a lot of mistakes. Three battles (and with the same, completely unsuccessful troops of levels 2-3 chosen by me as the main stacks) are not indicative for me at all. In football, Russia lost to Cyprus and Albania, so what? And the opponent turned out to be very experienced in TC3 (unlike me). For example, Oelm lost badly to the necromancer tonight (not to me, though), and according to the winner, he didn't have any particular problems with vampires. And in my game, 40 necromancers decided a lot; I never denied that they are practically the only decent troops for their level for the necromancer.