Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Dear Wlk777, are you claiming that Necropolis is a weak Castle in The Third Crusade 3? Especially if you play with two Castles (2x2, as intended by the map creators)?
It is definitely the strongest Castle, but not invincible, in my opinion.
If you ban the Tarsformer (which is done in serious games), Necropolis still remains above average. Arguments: Anti-morale for the opponent (almost always decisive) Vampires. If you protect them, they decide the outcome in the end Liches. Trash mobs-mana in The Third Crusade 3 are always decisive. Cavalry-double and curse (all units that cast in The Third Crusade 3 are extremely valuable) Curse and blindness do not work on undead Berserk only works with a Sphere
Weaknesses: Slag Dragons (but if you're lucky with aging, they can be decisive)
Regarding the game time in The Third Crusade 3. We're not talking about 20-30 minutes. If the opponents are equal, it's 2-3 hours.
Who attacks first, in my opinion, affects the overall outcome by 2-3%. According to the rules, whoever clicks second attacks.
I'm sure that after these words, Wlk777's claims about the weak Necropolis will significantly decrease, and his willingness to prove it in The Third Crusade 3 will disappear:D :D :D