Skip to content

DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”

User Avatar
#357
Auto-translated
It's been a bit quiet... Everyone (or at least many) wanted some measures to be taken against debtors :rolleyes:, so why are you all silent now?
Allow me to quote some notable people on the forum who have already supported this idea earlier (let this count as part of the "discussion":) ):
Dreamcatcher
On Heroesportal, this problem is solved by the fact that if a player has debts, i.e., unresponded reports against them, their subsequent victories are not counted in the rating until they respond to the debts.
Oelm
I support Dream 100%. IMHO the best solution to the problem.
Dirty_Player
+1
I consider it optimal!
Xaker

As for the "debt" system.
It is entirely optimal.
I fully support it.
Vigo
I fully support Dream!!!

Only I'd like to suggest an addition, if you will...

I propose introducing a panel of judges, to whom the last save of the game day is sent in case of a "non-confirming" player — they then determine the situation at that game moment and personally inform the Tournament Host that yes, the game took place, the saves were seen, and the "person who filed the report" is the winner in this situation. (Or something similar)
Only the judges should be skilled players (who know what they're talking about) and hold game-related and moral authority among beginner, developing players, and just the residents of HeroesWorld.
Ибу ибуди - хуйдао муди - Шаг за шагом можно достигнуть цели (китайская мудрость)

Кто к нам с пером придёт, тот от пера и погибнет!:smile51: