Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I propose introducing a panel of judges, to whom the last save of the game day is sent from the "non-confirming" player — they decide what the situation is at that game moment and personally inform the Tournament Host that yes, the game took place, saves have been seen, and the "person who filed the report" in this situation is the winner. (Or something like that) Only judges must be skilled players (who know what they're talking about) and who have game-related and moral authority among beginner, developing players, and just HeroesWorld residents.
Right, smart thoughts, respect. But what about a situation when a seemingly well-respected player (Vigo), clearly losing in the game, uses the slightest excuse in the form of a game crash on his own turn (well, my game crashed, but not on my turn, so at least you can't suspect that I quit somewhere and decided to cheat) to end the match, writes to me in ICQ something like "okay, you can file a report", and then when all saves have already been deleted, it turns out he had no intention of confirming anything, but the report has already been filed and there's no reason to delete it. This casts a shadow on the honesty of the player (me), which is doubly insulting after already forgiving this person for one lost match. So before discussing a panel of judges, some people simply need to learn how to behave like human beings, and then these judges might not even be needed. If he had told me in ICQ right away that he wouldn't confirm, I probably wouldn't have bothered with the report at all and would have forgotten about it soon, but this turned out, to put it mildly, unsightly. That match is already forgotten, the season is over, but I still haven't understood the reason for Mr. Vigo's behavior. Maybe he can explain something to me now? :smile27:
Wlk777
