Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I'd like to share my thoughts on the recent events. I think we need to calm down first and then draw conclusions from them. So, what I suggest is to use the experience of moderation systems from much more popular internet forums. For example, a simple system: each section is moderated by 2-3 people (on average). These positions are elective; usually, they appoint people who are well-known and respected, and their activities are rarely interfered with by the admins, often simply because there is no need for it. Practice shows that this kind of management is quite effective and useful, and conflicts and complaints rarely arise. I suggest introducing something similar here, at least in one of the sections (let's say, Heroes 3) and at least as an experiment. IMHO.