Controversial issues and their resolutions.

It's not a good idea to exclude such, let's say, "unsavory players" from Tournaments. Their inappropriate gameplay shouldn't be factored into the ranking at all! Especially now that we have a permanent ranking system, not just a seasonal one. I don't know who's in charge of world chess right now, but imagine if Anand stole Kramnik's rook while he wasn't looking:rolleyes:. Even if they weren't playing in an official tournament. And if asked where the piece went, since all the moves are recorded, he'd reply: "The system wrote it!" and then, right under the stunned opponent's nose, he'd snatch the queen as well. The same thing is happening on our site now. And it's not funny anymore because it's done so cynically that even Ostap Bender would be impressed! Someone might say that our scale is different... But there were ideas for seriously promoting "Heroes 3," for consolidating all thematic resources, for creating unified rules; I even heard that "Heroes 3" is more complex than chess. However, with such a careless attitude, how can we even talk about a great future for the online Heroes 3 community (at least on our forum)?