Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
And why didn't anyone insist on describing the battles, for example? Isn't that the most reliable way to verify, right? And you already messed things up at the beginning of the "argument" with the saves.
First of all, no one messed up with the saves! Yes, the first save was buggy, but the next two show the presence of cheats, which gives the probability of the truthfulness even of the first buggy save! Secondly, don't be offended, but do you even play the third game? If you do, at least look at the save of the game that was CONFIRMED. And then write your speculations/guesses and assumptions!
Then let's ban all offline players, they all use cheats and various additional programs.
I still don't understand what this phrase is about. What does offline have to do with it?