Controversial issues and their resolutions.

If you decide that there's no chance here, then simply exclude them from further participation in tournaments and games.

This flood (or, as it was called, "bullying") is happening because the administration (including the coordinator) is not in a hurry to fulfill its direct responsibilities. Here's a cheater, here's their proven guilt – take measures, ban them – permanently or temporarily...
Instead, the coordinator is reprimanding, possibly excessively harsh, forms of expressing legitimate indignation. In my opinion, this is fundamentally wrong. Understand, I personally have nothing against Alina; I had pleasant conversations with her on ICQ. But! The law is strict, but it is the law.
This is a significant situation – the way we deal with this case of identified and proven cheating will be observed not only by players, especially young ones, but also by obvious and not-so-obvious cheaters. If we make concessions, many young players will think that it's okay to do so...
P.S. You here want to remain noble and clean, those of the administration who play little (I think they understand who I mean – they are smart people), you make populist moves, you pity the cheaters, and we, who play often and for long periods, have to deal with the consequences...
The lack of inevitable punishment will inevitably lead to an increase in cheating.
Here, the situation is simple and clear:
If you don't punish the cheater (or only symbolically, by wagging your finger), you punish and harass us, the honest players, who are trying to introduce a code of honor as a rule of conduct. You simply offend us. It's one or the other; there is no third option.
P.P.S. And please, don't delete posts – there are no insults here; this is my position and the position of many honest players.