Unconfirmed reports.

Dear players,
Each game report must be confirmed to avoid cases of rating manipulation (or anything else).

I generally agree; I'll explain why now...

If your opponent hasn't confirmed a lost battle, you should consider whether to play against them. Be sure to report on the forum that your opponent hasn't confirmed the game. If there are several complaints, they will be banned from playing ranked matches.

Yes, you need to think about whether to play against them or not, but writing on the forum and reporting is a risky business... I once posted a report on the Portal and sent the opponent a link to the report (for convenience) - I received confirmation and forgot about it. Later, I saw that my report was unconfirmed, so I wrote directly, "If you have any questions, ask, or confirm the report" - I received an agreement to confirm the report again, but it turned out to be just words....
After this player confirmed another player's report, I posted on the Portal in the topic and forgot about it... and only now, from Dreamcatcher, did I learn that the player is "not ranked."
What I'm getting at is that in an attempt to help the opponent by providing a link to the report, I made a fool of myself, so I have "0" enjoyment from the game, and you (Xaker) are saying that I should do this with everyone who doesn't confirm? ... For me personally, this is nonsense....

We strongly encourage you to choose opponents in advance who treat the game with due responsibility.

No one is immune to newbies, and there is a very large percentage of players with "0" posts and above who may not confirm - and this is actually good (that there are many newbies)!

P.S. My vote is incorrect; if possible, move it to the 2nd option, "no." I really liked the friendly resource system that Dreamcatcher described - "freezing the player's subsequent games."