Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Pash, no offense intended. Moreover, I'm not saying that I'm definitely stronger than those who are being considered. What's important to me is the organizer's approach. The fact that there will be a "do whatever I want" principle at the beginning was also mentioned.
No, I'm not going to take someone else's place in the interportals, because all the players are worthy (and if we're talking about TE, then it's clear that I have nothing to do there). But in general, I think it's extremely important that there are clear selection criteria. In the previous interportal, there was a vote, which somehow helped to decide. There was a selector on the portal, and so on.
Therefore, I believe that in any case, the choice should be justified aloud and clearly. Otherwise, what's the point of participating in matches for the Portal in the future?
I'm for the idea that everyone should have a chance to represent their resource.