DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”

    Let the judges decide that. And also, Valentin, if you didn't confirm the report of your game with Oelm just so that they could sort out that game of yours with Vigo, then, in my opinion, that's a mistake... Because he's not to blame for this, and he shouldn't have problems because of it. In my opinion, these are not the right methods of influence, although (...) they are the only effective ones!..

Oh, it's not a fact that they are effective – no particular attention from the moderators has been noticed on this point. Apparently, a large number of unconfirmed reports is still better than one small addition to the rules...

P.S. And meanwhile, how many times have I already suggested this – including in the alternative rules project:smile26:. I think it should be formulated approximately like this: if a player has unconfirmed reports of defeat, their subsequent reports of victories will not be taken into account in the ratings until the reports are confirmed or refuted with evidence of a rules violation.