Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I'll state my opinion.
How I personally handle it: Very often, almost always, I offer auto-cast, sometimes even insist on it. I sometimes suggest something like this, so the opponent doesn't feel obligated: take auto-cast now, but in return, I'll also have one auto-cast in reserve. But I can also refuse to offer auto-cast, and I won't bother explaining why.
In general: It shouldn't be a strict rule, and I don't think it's worth discussing further (we'll just clutter the thread, and they won't change the rules anyway, and that's a good thing). Unofficially – why not? It's like a rule of good etiquette, that's fine. But we need to immediately preventively shut down the mouths of those who, if they don't get auto-cast (well, the opponent doesn't want to give it – it's their right, maybe they think you don't deserve auto-cast in this situation), will start whining and putting pressure on others, saying something like, "Player X is losing, he's being stingy, etc."
Стратегия - искусство возможного.
Первое правило форума : "Хвалу и клевету приемли равнодушно И не оспаривай глупца" (с)
Новичкам: ВНИМАТЕЛЬНО перечитайте ВЕСЬ первый пост по нижеприведенной ссылке и 90% ваших вопросов отпадут( на остальные 10% с удовольствием отвечу): Правила онлайн игр