Do you prefer armor or attack?

Auto-translated

Dirty_Player

Shakti exists, but so does Galtran, who feels great with armor. Offense is a good help for those whose strike force consists of melee units. But Rampart, for example, needs ranged attacks and defense; attack is certainly needed, but much less.

Gosha doesn't rely on defense; he relies on raising skeletons. Without that, he would be a weak hero, and armor wouldn't help him. This is a fact. Rampart needs ranged attacks and defense more in the first 2-3 weeks. After that, angels, vipers from hives, etc., become the main deciding factors. It's unlikely that you can rely on elves in a battle against a human opponent.

Added 1 minute later

Dubrovin Pavel

Perhaps it's due to the tech tree, or perhaps in the early stages, the advantage lies with the one who has Attack, but it would be interesting to know if the heroes have more than one unit in their army. My intuition suggests that the more numerous the army on both sides, the more Defense wins.

As you wrote earlier, the first turn often decides the outcome. If it's the one with Attack who goes first, then defense may not help at all.

Reading content in

Interface language

Do you prefer armor or attack?