Do you prefer armor or attack?

I saw a post on Bay while the experiment was being conducted:
- with equal Defense and Attack;
- with equal levels of the Attack and Defense Skills;
- with an equal number and quality of creatures - the one with Defense wins.

Well, I do not agree with this. In a hero vs. hero battle, it is already very difficult to say what is better. I tested it personally. Kreg against Tazar, both level 20, equal parameters and each with 1 Archangel. The damage turned out to be equal down to the single digit!!!

But in battles with neutrals, armor is still more important, as it often saves you from random losses, from neutral BD drops, etc., and consequently leads to fewer failures. Reliability still decides!

P.S.: On Bay they play TE, where Armor reduces 20%, not 15% like in SoD; that's a completely different story...