Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
And who forbids a +6 helmet? – show me such a clause in my set of rules. The same applies to Chupa-chups – if a Teapot is clearly not a “broken” item yet, as it can easily be countered with at least a sword + amulet or a large bag of gold, then Chupa-chups often fits the definition of a “broken” item in many cases: for example, we pumped up magic, and 8 out of 10 artifacts are magical, and the skills are, say, Earth, Air, Wisdom, Intelligence, and also not purely fighter-oriented skills like Logistics and Tactics – are there any chances with this set against a decent Barbarian or Swamp creature in skilled hands, even if we have more hit points left? Notice that I haven’t banned almost anything in my rules, but rather made life a little (not much!) more difficult for owners of such artifacts, and wouldn’t a strong player be afraid of such minor difficulties?
Ибу ибуди - хуйдао муди - Шаг за шагом можно достигнуть цели (китайская мудрость)
Кто к нам с пером придёт, тот от пера и погибнет!:smile51: