No, I haven't, of course. I played it once, and that's it.
I played it enough to compare the third and fourth games.
But reading 40 pages of the same thing seems unnecessary.
The game may not be to your liking, but the statement that "the strategy is terrible compared to the third game" is incorrect.
P.S. I suspect that you won't finish this pointless argument, so I'm washing my hands of it. I've said my piece.
