On-line rating (discussion)

I don't understand why people should suffer, wasting their time for no reason, because of some irresponsible players who "forget" to confirm defeats. I suggest the following: if a report isn't confirmed, it should be motivated by something, either in the "Reports..." thread or in a special one. Even if you just played against this person and think they're cheating, why hide it? Write on the forum: "There is evidence (game logs, saves, screenshots, etc.) that the player violated the rules." If there is no such evidence, then apologize – WHY aren't you confirming it? Why did you even start playing? I believe that if you agree to play with someone, you automatically consider that person honest. But if doubts about their honesty arise during the game, and there is no evidence, you can post it on the forum and stop playing with them, but you MUST confirm this game; otherwise, you are acting dishonestly, and whether your opponent is honest or not is another question. P.S. Given the abnormally high number of unconfirmed games, I think it's time to appoint a special person to monitor confirmations, even to the point of nagging those who don't confirm, if confirmations or accusations against the opponent with an official refusal to confirm don't follow within a certain time (at least 2-3 days). It would be best if this were an experienced player with a good reputation, beyond any doubt. But if no one agrees, I can try to take on this thankless task. In general, I offer my candidacy.