Alex_R
Auto-translated
Without specifically discussing Oleg-Aldegir, it just doesn't make sense that a player who won 7 games and lost 2 ends up ranked higher than Britvochka (Andrey), who has approximately 8 losses and around 30 wins... :smile11:
I think this system is just a little inadequate with a small sample size; as the number of games increases, everything will stabilize.
Slav, can't you adjust some kind of coefficient? :)
No, of course, nothing should be "adjusted"... it just needs time. In general, it would be more logical to calculate the rating at the end of the period/season.
But considering that everyone is very interested in watching the rating change, we have what we have, and we should be happy about it :).
I understand that the rating will not be reset, and over time it will become more objective... let's say, each player should play at least 20 games, and preferably 50, and then everything will be fine!
P.S. It's a pity that not everyone can play that much; I think that if I've played less than 50 games in all this time, when will I reach the optimal sample size? :smile32:
P.S. P.S. Or maybe it's still necessary to use a program or another calculation mechanism, as it would be more objective to retroactively credit the games played in previous seasons, since they weren't that long (only 1 year).