Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Everything is great and wonderful, and if it's important, I, for example, am for it.
One question: for example, after 2 months, it reaches the point where, for winning against me, the so-called "TOP" player receives 1 point. What's the point for them in playing against me then? Everyone is talking about this, that you can't increase your rating by playing against weak players.
But what if this weak player wants to learn how to play, improve their skills, etc.?
Won't it turn out that the TOP players will only play against TOP players, and the weak players will play against weak players? Then it becomes a kind of analogue of a neighboring development – the one about the top league (or about 2 leagues).
Just some thoughts, I said what came to mind.