HeroesWorld
  • Log in
  • Create account
  • Mode
    Interface scale

Alternative rating.

Show in topic
User Avatar
Offline StickyFingaz
Registered:
Posts: 1,486
#40
Auto-translated
Everything is clearly explained in the links; I believe we should use a method that has been tested by time and millions, not just one person.
I don't understand. Was your rating calculated based on it? Or is it a hassle to play according to my suggestion? I agree, it's easy to beat weak players, and if you also win in ranked seasons... that's awesome. But here, some "guy" is just showing off and asserting his rights. Go ahead, try to win in the ranking... it's a hassle...

I'll repeat the questions:
The most accurate rating can be obtained based on tournaments in which players of approximately equal strength play.
Do we have such tournaments?
The Elo rating system is based on the assumption that the strength of each chess player can be represented as a probabilistic variable, following a normal distribution.
Its scientific basis is very questionable.
Well, explain the scientific basis to me then =)
The calculation of a specific player's rating based on the results of a tournament is based on comparing the number of points they scored with the expected number of points, predicted based on their rating.
Will you predict how many points a player will score?
If, according to the results of the tournament, the number of points scored turns out to be greater than the predicted value, then the rating of that player increases.
Well, mostly ranked games are played here. What should we do with them?
Everything is clearly written in the links.
MEGA LOL. It's all in English =). Translate it, and we'll understand; some people here might not understand English.
0
⚖️
0
Show in topic