Alternative rating.

Wouldn't it turn out that players with high ratings would refuse to play with low-rated players?

Honestly? It will. It's better than inflating ratings in this way with the current system.

It was well thought out by specialists and is actually used in WCG.

It was well thought out by specialists, but it is not used in WCG, but in a game that was one of its disciplines, i.e., a very popular game.

Sticky, will you constantly keep track of all this?!

Honestly? I don't know. I will definitely keep track of it for the next 4 months, with a frequency of every 1-2 days, as promised (unless unforeseen situations occur). If anything, a replacement can always be found.

I looked at this table, and it seems that players like DuHo and Javdet are ranked suspiciously low.

I don't remember about DuHo, but Javdet didn't win against anyone in this season. He has about 3 wins and 8 losses (all from memory), so it will take some time for him to improve his ranking.

Now, about the main thing...
I want to not award bonus points for Tournaments. Basically, my statement:

In the alternative ranking, only pure skill is taken into account, without bonuses for Tournaments and the number of games played.

Why? Bonuses are already awarded in the existing ranking - one, the ranking without bonuses is more objective - two. But if the community wants it, I will keep track of and award bonuses for places after the Tournament.

Today, I will also award points from Tournament games.