Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
If this formula wasn't your invention, but was well-considered by specialists and is actually used in WCG, then I would certainly agree that it is more objective. Regarding tournaments, I believe that a victory in a tournament game should be counted the same as in a regular game, as there is no significant difference. If you were to provide a detailed record for each player, showing who they won against, with which castle, and when, you would be highly valued :smile02: In general, it's interesting to know what formulas are used to calculate rankings in sports; I don't think this is a new question, so why reinvent the wheel? We should adopt and implement it:smile33: If this ranking is used to determine the winner of the season, then it should be reset each season. But if it is intended to determine a player's skill level, then it really shouldn't be reset, as skill needs to be assessed with a large sample size. Regarding skill, I believe that it can increase rapidly in newcomers, while in experienced players, it grows very slowly or fluctuates around a certain level; in short, it's analogous to the level of heroes