Skip to content

Project "Money comes and goes, but Heroes are eternal!"

User Avatar
#63
Auto-translated
IronAxe;21191
Why separate the ranks of those who participate in Tournaments from those who don’t?
After all, ranks can be bought for money. I don’t think a Tournament participant will have more money than a Landowner; quite the opposite.
Because a person who doesn’t play in Tournaments can change their mind and join a Tournament at any time and start earning a rating, regardless of what rank they have. And if a Knight-Tournament participant leaves the Tournament, why shouldn’t they keep the rank they already had? Let them go to the Landowners; it’s their right.
Besides, they are simply incomparable. They reflect different aspects. For example, a person has a Tournament Rating of 7 and a Work Rating of 3. And it immediately becomes clear that they are more of a player than a worker. Naturally, both of these Ratings will be present for everyone; they will just have different values.

Added 1 minute ago
IronAxe;21191
I disagree with this. Don’t joke with the old ladies – people don’t like that :)
And the rating should be reset at the beginning of the year. Otherwise, the Super Tournament at the end of the year doesn’t make sense. After all, the rating is the qualifying score for it, and it needs to be accumulated throughout the year to get to the Super Tournament. I wrote that the points need to be read in a cycle. That is, after the 10th, read again from the 1st. When the cycle works, the system is stable.
If the Rating is reset, it will be unclear how the person behaved in the previous year. You can simply create a counter for the Super Tournament, but let the Ratings accumulate.
Мы спасемся? Я не знаю. Верьте...
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: artem