Auto-translated
Why separate the ranks of those who participate in Tournaments from those who don’t?
After all, ranks can be bought for money. I don’t think a Tournament participant will have more money than a Landowner; quite the opposite.
Because a person who doesn’t play in Tournaments can change their mind and join a Tournament at any time and start earning a rating, regardless of what rank they have. And if a Knight-Tournament participant leaves the Tournament, why shouldn’t they keep the rank they already had? Let them go to the Landowners; it’s their right.
Added 1 minute ago
I disagree with this. Don’t joke with the old ladies – people don’t like that :)
And the rating should be reset at the beginning of the year. Otherwise, the Super Tournament at the end of the year doesn’t make sense. After all, the rating is the qualifying score for it, and it needs to be accumulated throughout the year to get to the Super Tournament. I wrote that the points need to be read in a cycle. That is, after the 10th, read again from the 1st. When the cycle works, the system is stable.
Мы спасемся? Я не знаю. Верьте...
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.