Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
1. 6 minutes is definitely preferable. The reasons have already been stated, and I won't repeat myself. Sometimes I can't manage in 4 minutes because 1) I'm not very good; 2) I want to improve. BUT: some people can manage in 6 minutes – why take that advantage away from them? Those who want 6 minutes can agree on it, and the rules can state 4 minutes.loi
I suggest a compromise between 4 and 6 minutes: We play with 4 minutes, but each player has the option to load their autosave N times (for example, N=3, or N can be discussed before the game...) and finish the game.
That's a fresh idea, I like it. Bravo. I will definitely try it. But again, it should be by agreement. Including this in the rules would be an unnecessary hassle.
2. Resetting to turn 116 during a match is nonsense. I remember when a player with 40 upgraded bows and other things appeared on my opponent's starting town at turn 113. There were two options: either try to defeat him with a difficult combination of units or reset to turn 113. I chose to reset to 113, but what if that wasn't possible? My pride would have been hurt, and it's a ridiculous rule anyway.
3. Building 3 levels of magic in two castles when you don't have a 4th castle, but really need it, is nonsense. I will never do that; I'll just discard the scroll.
Kash
