Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The administrator, apparently, is unaware of this state of affairs. Therefore, the issue of the morality of posts largely rests with the moderators. What am I getting at? The fact that a post is often considered immoral on the surface, but a moderator, in my opinion, should think three times before deleting an "immoral" post. For example: a thread about hentai. Although, to put it mildly, I don't like this type of animation, I don't consider it particularly immoral. Because erotica is considered an art form. And to prohibit access to beauty is stupid and absurd. Moreover, a topic about prostitution is not immoral, but quite the opposite – it shows the causes of this social pathology. But here's an example: let's say there's a thread about world history. One of the posts describes and mentions the city of Suceava (the former capital of Moldova in the Middle Ages). Should this post be considered immoral in the "insult" category? No, of course not! And a moderator who would penalize this post could, at best, be considered incompetent. Now we need to think: what are we being punished for? Because the person responsible for maintaining order in matters of morality does not understand the opinions of others?
Любовь и атомное оружие, братья, любовь и атомное оружие.