Supreme
Auto-translated
Tigra, what happened with your argument with IronAxe? It looks like Joker had a great time...
From the moderator: They had a small disagreement; I don't think we should discuss it here...
I sympathize with the decrease in your morale, but... I see you turned off Caps Lock :) Thank you for helping to generate new ideas. You're stimulating us in a way :)
To IronAxe: Regarding the Rank, I think it's clear to everyone that VDV_Forever's rank isn't working... and it doesn't reflect activity on the site at all. I suggest awarding 30 points for the top three places, 20 for 4-10, 10 for 11-20, and 5 for everyone who submits verified saves. + 30 points for the description of the playthrough - 1st place, 25 points - 2nd, 20 points - 3rd, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4 points - 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th. (Points, i.e., Rank) + Award Rank for activity on the site, + for any work at the organizer's discretion, but no more than 15 points. Something like that.
Regarding the average rank. Yes, there are probably many formulas, but the simpler, the better. It is known from probability theory or statistics that many average formulas work well if many tests are performed. Based on this concept and the fact that everything brilliant should be simple.
I suggest the following option.
"Average Rank" = p/n, when n>10
. . . . . . . . . . . . = 0, otherwise
where p is the sum of ranks, n is the number of Tournaments.
Although 10 is not a sufficient number for statistics, IMHO, this formula will more or less realistically reflect the average rank.
Regarding special artifacts... Well, I don't know; I don't think it's a good idea... Although, I still can't find a constructive answer to your question about why the Wandering Knights need money... Only a moral one...
If we (and I include myself in this group because virtual fame is a hundred times more important to me than virtual money...) "Knights of Honor" play for money and play for fame and honor (ranking), then we are not very concerned with all sorts of nonsense (this is about my idea :)) with lands, Ranks, and Ashans. Money is needed for us at most to have the freedom to participate or not participate in Tournaments where it is needed! (whether it's wars or Tournaments with special artifacts or whatever else they come up with)
That's it, and those who are not interested in this have the opportunity to become landowners! And everyone is happy!
From the moderator: They had a small disagreement; I don't think we should discuss it here...
I sympathize with the decrease in your morale, but... I see you turned off Caps Lock :) Thank you for helping to generate new ideas. You're stimulating us in a way :)
To IronAxe: Regarding the Rank, I think it's clear to everyone that VDV_Forever's rank isn't working... and it doesn't reflect activity on the site at all. I suggest awarding 30 points for the top three places, 20 for 4-10, 10 for 11-20, and 5 for everyone who submits verified saves. + 30 points for the description of the playthrough - 1st place, 25 points - 2nd, 20 points - 3rd, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4 points - 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th. (Points, i.e., Rank) + Award Rank for activity on the site, + for any work at the organizer's discretion, but no more than 15 points. Something like that.
Regarding the average rank. Yes, there are probably many formulas, but the simpler, the better. It is known from probability theory or statistics that many average formulas work well if many tests are performed. Based on this concept and the fact that everything brilliant should be simple.
I suggest the following option.
"Average Rank" = p/n, when n>10
. . . . . . . . . . . . = 0, otherwise
where p is the sum of ranks, n is the number of Tournaments.
Although 10 is not a sufficient number for statistics, IMHO, this formula will more or less realistically reflect the average rank.
Regarding special artifacts... Well, I don't know; I don't think it's a good idea... Although, I still can't find a constructive answer to your question about why the Wandering Knights need money... Only a moral one...
If we (and I include myself in this group because virtual fame is a hundred times more important to me than virtual money...) "Knights of Honor" play for money and play for fame and honor (ranking), then we are not very concerned with all sorts of nonsense (this is about my idea :)) with lands, Ranks, and Ashans. Money is needed for us at most to have the freedom to participate or not participate in Tournaments where it is needed! (whether it's wars or Tournaments with special artifacts or whatever else they come up with)
That's it, and those who are not interested in this have the opportunity to become landowners! And everyone is happy!
