Corwin
Auto-translated
Dear vbn.
I understand your desire to maintain order and cleanliness in the threads. But there are things that shouldn't be censored.
In this thread, a number of statements were made that I believe distort reality, and I have grounds for this (some of which I have provided). These statements create a certain opinion among forum users, which is not entirely accurate. I felt it was necessary to speak out about this. Since this is not documentation, but a communication forum, issues such as PR, politics, and the like should also be important.
It cannot be the case that it is permissible to say one thing to one person, but attempts to explain that what was said earlier does not entirely correspond to reality are censored.
In the form in which my posts are presented, they say absolutely nothing of what I actually wanted to say. I don't know who they are needed for and what they mean in this form.
I did not remove the "off-topic" tags from the messages because I didn't put them there. But there are two options here:
Either I ask to remove the tags and leave the posts as they are, because I said everything I wanted to say there and I have nothing more to add. This is regarding the continuation of the argument, if you are afraid of it.
Or I ask to delete these posts completely, because, as I said, I did not say what they have been turned into.
However, the question remains open as to why the statements themselves, which have no basis, are not deleted. But I can live with that.
And by the way, my opponent's post also needs to be fully restored. It is very revealing, and it immediately shows the extent to which the person understands what I am saying. Leave it to the reader to understand and choose the opinion they agree with.
Thank you for your attention.
Dear Corwin and Docent Picolan! Your posts numbered 359, 363, 377, and 378 have been fully restored, but a warning phrase has been added to the beginning of each of these posts: Everything written in this message regarding the development of Horn of the Abyss is the personal opinion of Mr. ..., has insufficient evidence, and cannot claim to be the ultimate truth. If you are concerned that the post was moderated, remove the link to vbn from the posts and use the meaning of the italicized phrase in your own words.