Спай
Auto-translated
I completely understand. :) I was referring to this "advantageous" situation. And ultimately, those who somehow manage to win such a battle, regardless of how, receive the same result. That is, whether it's done one way or another, there will be some imbalance between those who won and those who lost such a battle.
.
And, by the way, I don't think that such people deserve to win _just_ because they played such a battle, even if they spent a lot of time on it. Because anyone can do it; it doesn't require much intelligence.
The one who calculates everything best, thinks it through, measures it, wins _complex_ tactical battles, and knows how to do without such battles, i.e., defeats everyone with their mind, not with brute force, deserves to win.
.
That's it.
.
And, by the way, I don't think that such people deserve to win _just_ because they played such a battle, even if they spent a lot of time on it. Because anyone can do it; it doesn't require much intelligence.
The one who calculates everything best, thinks it through, measures it, wins _complex_ tactical battles, and knows how to do without such battles, i.e., defeats everyone with their mind, not with brute force, deserves to win.
.
That's it.