Bullets simply won't penetrate, and it's hard to hit with a projectile.
This Knight (just one?! Well, well... even logically, you can figure it out...) is holding a sword made of an unknown metal, and again, unknown enchantments are placed on it.
This is not pure magic; it's a way to give the sword certain properties.
It's just ordinary metal, with no properties. Do you want me to refute it for you right away?
"No, it's enchanted metal, with a lot of magic!!". We repeat the paragraph from beginning to end again and again, and there's nothing new. It's getting boring.
No one said that dragon hide is a solid frame. It's scales.
Why would they need feathers? Bats don't have them either, and they fly.
They are supported in the air by incredible strength.
And why wouldn't magic support them?
There is no incredible strength. A dragon is not stronger than a giant or a cyclops. Besides, to stay in the air with such wings, it would also be necessary to flap them quickly in the air, with "incredible strength."
No one knows what they are capable of. And if a ship needs to overcome various physical obstacles, then a dragon that can cast teleportation has to overcome something even greater...
Any questions?
In what proportion? And nothing is known about the nature of these units.
Uncle
1. This single arrow was very unusual. Don't tell me...
2. Smok had a hole in his belly... 2x2 cm. It's all about accuracy.
2. This hole was in the coating of dragon stones, which had grown into the dragon's belly over time, thereby covering it with a hard layer. Without this incident, his belly was completely bare, as dragons are not born with gemstones embedded in their stomachs.
I'm tired of this. It's clear that a dragonophile will look for any, even the most stupid and obviously false arguments to defend their point of view.