Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I'm not confusing things; I'm making assumptions and building my own silly theories.
Here:
Intelligence exists, but there is no freedom of thought. This is what distinguishes a tool from a person, which is why it cannot be said that Arthas went anywhere on his own; he didn't choose the goal, and he couldn't refuse it.
And here:
Oh, of course, that's how it is. But since the blade imposed its will on him, what did Arthas become? Wasn't he the embodiment of the blade's will?
Arthas, in essence, doesn't exist, right? There's only the will of the blade, which erased him. Is that correct?
Tomorrow holds no promises Except the ones we've made
Wistrit
