Fantasy vs. Science Fiction

No, mercenaries are mercenaries, soldiers are soldiers. Jimmy is Jimmy.

Well, if that’s what you want:)
But then there can be no talk of students with overpowered artifacts in their mouths, eager to take revenge on universal evil. Because these are truly different things.

That’s why.

I think the phrase "Sumerian fantasy" is complete nonsense, rather than "Sumerian tales" or "philosophical fantasy" instead of "philosophical tales." For some reason, there is no consistency in the definition of the gender of the word "fantasy."

Wikipedia. A shroud for the dead, sewn to perfection:) In essence, fantasy is something more than:

no less influence of the knightly adventure novel, the historical novel, a detailed description of the world, internal consistency.

And if we’re going to go that far, we can also consider Ray Bradbury to be a philosopher.

P.S. Gremlins are capable of dealing with a ballista that fires automatically at a rate of one shot per second without outside help, with self-igniting arrows. I can’t imagine what they would do with a rocket...:)
Celestial Shield can be cast many times, there is a lot of mana. But rockets run out. Unlike archers’ arrows, which they draw from a cart with ammunition.
No one said that the hero is alone;) An Orc for one unit, a mage for another. :)
Right?;)
P.P.S. And then a Warlock-warrior on a dragon will still fly in and kill everyone, like this :p
P.P.P.S. We are still arguing. :)
P.P.P.P.S. Yes, and SF and Fantasy are 50/50 :) but nevertheless...:)