Auto-translated
1. For the patch.
2. For the third, fourth, fifth... criterion.
3. Artifacts should be taken into account, and parameters should be calculated after the battle.
As I see it, the first two criteria should be left to the organizer's discretion, while the rest should be standard and unchanged – and they are only needed to rank players with equal results (this is a normal practice in professional sports) and to eliminate the factor of subjectivity.
P.S.
to DmitriyAS
It's not clear why you are against the patch. New things are always met with skepticism, but are there any specific arguments? So far, everything I've read boils down to the fact that it's "no longer Heroes" and other things that are not very relevant to the topic at hand. What can you say about the substance of the matter?
So far, the obvious advantages are:
1. Easier work for the organizer.
2. A constant battle map.
Plus a few less obvious ones, such as reducing the actual time spent on battles.
P.P.S.
to DmitriyAS
I respect your opinion, but let's not be subtly rude. I think you have enough arguments to express your thoughts without it.